Skip to content

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #8577) #8580

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #8577) #8580

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+16 −30

Conversation

@DivyanshuVortex
Copy link
Contributor

@DivyanshuVortex DivyanshuVortex commented Nov 23, 2025

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: na
  • task: lint_package_json status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves #8577

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • fixs JavaScript Linting Failures

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@DivyanshuVortex
chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #XX)
419f13f 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@DivyanshuVortex
chore: fix JavaScript lint errors
85ed258 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Nov 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
utils/async/for-each $\color{green}517/517$
$color{green}+100.00%$ 		$\color{green}59/59$
$color{green}+100.00%$ 		$\color{green}8/8$
$color{green}+100.00%$ 		$\color{green}517/517$
$color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. label Nov 24, 2025
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Nov 26, 2025

Ref: #8582

This PR contains a number of unrelated documentation changes. See the referenced PR for an example of a more surgical set of proposed changes which explicitly addresses the encountered lint failure.

@kgryte kgryte added autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Nov 26, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Thank you for working on this pull request. However, we cannot accept your contribution as the issue this pull request seeks to resolve has already been addressed in a different pull request or commit.

Thank you again for your interest in stdlib, and we look forward to reviewing your future contributions.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot closed this Nov 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix JavaScript lint errors

3 participants

@DivyanshuVortex @stdlib-bot @kgryte